Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) occurring in children is a malignant blood disease that arises during the process of myeloid cells producing white blood cells. It accounts estimated to be less than 3% of all childhood leukemia cases [1]. While CML predominantly affects adults, when it occurs in children, it is categorized into childhood onset and adolescent onset forms. The disease typically manifests just before puberty. In the adult type, the Philadelphia chromosome gene plays a significant role. The
A 14-year-old boy presented at the outpatient clinic with nephrotic range proteinuria. This patient had experienced proteinuria since the age of 4 years. Initially diagnosed with childhood onset nephrotic syndrome, he received standard treatment with steroids. However, the patient relapsed every 3 to 4 months and was subsequently diagnosed with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. The patient initially received cyclophospha-mide as an alternative immunosuppressive therapy for steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. After experiencing remission of one year while on cyclosporine, there was another relapse three months later. Due to frequent recurrences, combination treatment with rituximab and steroids was started, and fortunately, the patient was in successful remission within 2 weeks of treatment. The patient was subsequently followed up through outpatient care. The platelet count in the patient’s complete blood count performed at the time of remission was 667,000/mL, but thrombocytosis worsened to 985,000/mL 2 months later. At this time, other values were normal, including hemoglobin 14.5 g/dL and white blood cell count 9,570/mL How-ever, in the complete blood count performed 1 month later, hemoglobin 13.5 g/dL, white blood cell count 25,110/mL, and platelet count 1,371,000/mL. As thrombocytosis continued without improvement and leukocytosis was also accompanied, a bone marrow examination was performed. As a result,
Most of pediatric CML cases, imatinib mesylate is commonly used as a first line therapy. However, for patients who experience relapsed or resistance to imatinib mesylate, second generation TKIs are used. Currently, second generation TKIs are also frequently used as first line treatments in adults. Notably, dasatinib has been associated with a higher risk of proteinuria compared to other TKIs [7]. The mechanism of kidney damage caused by dasatinib is not fully elucidated, but it has been associated with the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). VEGF is a factor produced by kidney podocytes and plays a crucial role in the development and maintenance of normal glomerular function. Dasatinib disrupts the VEGF signaling pathway, leading to kidney damage and, consequently, proteinuria [7,8]. While some cases of dasatinb induced nephrotic syndrome have been reported in adults, pediatric cases are rare, making early suspicion less common.
The pediatric cases of dasatinib-induced nephrotic syndrome, including this case, total five cases reported [9-12]. These cases presented clinical characteristics in Table 1. In this case, a pediatric patient with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome concurrently developed CML. The situation was challenging because the patient was already at risk for nephrotic syndrome relapse, and it was difficult to immediately suspect dastinib induced nephrotic syndrome. Notably, the patient who had been diagnosed with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome during childhood and received first line steroid standard therapy. Subsequently, the experienced recurrent relapses and steroid dependence. As a second line treatment, the patient received cyclo-sporine. Later, after rituximab use, the patient was diagnosed with CML. Given the possibility of nephrotic syndrome relapsed due to the patient’s medical history, it was initially challenging suspect dasatinib induced nephrotic syndrome. However, since the patient exhibited progressive proteinuria unresponsive to standard steroid therapy, it was crucial to differentiate secondary causes of relapsed nephrotic syndrome. The highlights the need for further evaluation, including additional tests such as serum complement level, specific antibody for certain glomerular disease, markers of vasculitis, and especially kidney biopsy. Considering the potential coexistence of secondary causes of nephrotic syndrome in pediatric patients with a history of primary idiopathic nephrotic syndrome, kidney biopsy results play an important role in determining the therapeutic plan. Upon reviewing the previously reported pediatric cases [9,10], which included only two cases with histologic findings, it was observed that foot process effacement was consistently associated with dasatinib induced nephrotic syndrome including this case. However, in adult’s cases, diverse finding presented, such as focal global glomerulosclerosis, mild chronic tubulointerstitial changes, diffuse segmental corrugation or double contouring [13]. This discrepancy may be attributed to difference in the mechanisms of kidney damage between pediatric and adult populations or variations related to exposure to nephrotoxic medications. Though, given the limited nature of this pediatric case, generalizing the biopsy results is challenging. Further research will be necessary in the future. This case biopsy results confirmed minimal change disease, and the possibility of other secondary glomerular disease based on laboratory blood tests was low. Ultimately, considering dasatinib induced nephrotic syndrome, discontinuation of dasatinib fortunately led to an improvement in pro-teinuria. However, in some cases where CML is poorly controlled or treatment is initiated early, stopping the medication may not be feasible. Consequently, some adult patients have reported improvement in proteinuria after switching to the second generation TKI nilotinib [14].
Table 1 . Clinical characteristics of dasatinib induced nephrotic syndrome in pediatric patients.
Case | Age | Sex | Diagnostic disease | Previous TKI | Dasatinib duration | Urine PC ratio | Kidney biopsy | Prognosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
[9] | 3 | F | Ph+CML | Imatinib | 17 months | 17 g/g | Global sclerosis, segmental mesangial proliferation, focal foot processes effacement | Discontinued, prednisone, ACE inhibitor remission |
[10] | 5 | M | Ph+ALL | Imatinib | 26 days | 15.24 g/g | Fusion of foot processes | Discontinued, remission |
[11] | 8 | F | Ph+ALL | Imatinib | 2 months | 15.29 g/g | N/A | Continuation, intermittent proteinuria |
[12] | 14 | M | Ph+pre B ALL | N/A | 10 months | N/A | N/A | Dose reduction, recovery |
Index | 14 | M | Ph+CML | Imatinib | 4 months | 11.7 g/g | Focal foot process effacement | Discontinued, prednisone, remission |
TKI, tyrosin kinase inhibitor; PC, protein/creatinine; Ph+, philadelphia positive; CML, chronic myelogenous leukemia; ACE inhibitor, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; N/A, not available; Pre B ALL, precusor B cell lymphoblastic leukemia..
In conclusion, this case serves as a valuable example, highlighting the need to consider dasatinib induced neph-rotic syndrome when proteinuria occurs in patients using dasatinib and monitoring proteinuria. Therefore, when starting dasatinib treatment, it is necessary to inquire about the patient’s kidney function and history of kidney-related diseases. Additionally, it underscores the importance of individualized treatment decisions, including medication discontinuation or switching to alternative drugs. Furthermore, this case emphasized the need to approach histological difference between dasatinib induced nephrotic syndrome in pediatric and adults’ patients.
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.